Thread
Commits
-
Fix incorrect print format in json.c
- f2130e77da51 14.0 landed
-
Centralize json and jsonb handling of datetime types
- cc4feded0a31 11.0 cited
-
printing oid with %d
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> — 2020-07-28T01:55:23Z
+JsonEncodeDateTime(char *buf, Datum value, Oid typid) ... + elog(ERROR, "unknown jsonb value datetime type oid %d", typid); I think this should be %u. commit cc4feded0a31d2b732d4ea68613115cb720e624e Author: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> Date: Tue Jan 16 19:07:13 2018 -0500 Centralize json and jsonb handling of datetime types -
Re: printing oid with %d
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2020-07-28T07:59:48Z
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:55:23PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > +JsonEncodeDateTime(char *buf, Datum value, Oid typid) > ... > + elog(ERROR, "unknown jsonb value datetime type oid %d", typid); > > I think this should be %u. Good catch. Yep, Oids are unsigned. We don't backpatch such things usually, do we? Particularly, this one should not be triggerable normally because no code paths should call JsonEncodeDateTime() with an unsupported type Oid. -- Michael
-
Re: printing oid with %d
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2020-07-28T14:35:54Z
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > Good catch. Yep, Oids are unsigned. We don't backpatch such things > usually, do we? Particularly, this one should not be triggerable > normally because no code paths should call JsonEncodeDateTime() with > an unsupported type Oid. Yeah, given that it should be an unreachable case, there's likely no need to back-patch. regards, tom lane
-
Re: printing oid with %d
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2020-07-29T05:58:15Z
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:35:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah, given that it should be an unreachable case, there's likely > no need to back-patch. Thanks. Fixed on HEAD then. -- Michael