Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?

Hi,

On 2020-07-24 11:33:52 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> For logical replication there is no need to implement this, but others are
> using the pgoutput plugin for Change Data Capture. The reason they are
> using pgoutput is because it is guaranteed to be available as it is in core
> postgres.
> 
> Implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB provides some synchronization facility
> that is not easily replicated.

It's definitely useful. Probably needs to be parameter that signals
whether they should be sent out?

Greetings,

Andres Freund