Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate use of name "relkind"
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-07-11T04:44:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 10:00:47PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > There are two patches on this thread v2-0001 being much smaller than > v2-0002. I have looked at 0001 for now, and, like Alvaro, this > renaming makes sense to me. Those commands work on objects that are > relkinds, except for one OBJECT_TYPE. So, let's get 0001 patch > merged. Any objections from others? I have been through this one again and applied it as cc35d89. -- Michael
Commits
-
Rename field "relkind" to "objtype" for CTAS and ALTER TABLE nodes
- cc35d8933a21 14.0 landed