Thread

Commits

  1. Remove WARNING message from brin_desummarize_range

  2. BRIN de-summarization

  1. Intermittent BRIN failures on hyrax and lousyjack

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2020-06-30T16:24:11Z

    Buildfarm member hyrax has shown this failure twice recently:
    
    --- /home/buildfarm/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/test/regress/expected/brin.out	2020-01-23 11:10:05.730014075 -0500
    +++ /home/buildfarm/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/test/regress/results/brin.out	2020-06-30 03:50:23.651196117 -0400
    @@ -490,6 +490,7 @@
     INSERT INTO brintest_2 VALUES (numrange(0, 2^1000::numeric));
     INSERT INTO brintest_2 VALUES ('(-1, 0)');
     SELECT brin_desummarize_range('brinidx', 0);
    +WARNING:  leftover placeholder tuple detected in BRIN index "brinidx", deleting
      brin_desummarize_range 
     ------------------------
      
    This happened on HEAD:
    https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hyrax&dt=2020-06-30%2001%3A41%3A50
    and v13:
    https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hyrax&dt=2020-06-17%2005%3A50%3A46
    and lousyjack has also shown it once on HEAD:
    https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=lousyjack&dt=2020-03-02%2013%3A03%3A04
    
    The warning is from this bit (commit c655899ba):
    
        /*
         * Because of ShareUpdateExclusive lock, this function shouldn't run
         * concurrently with summarization.  Placeholder tuples can only exist as
         * leftovers from crashed summarization, so if we detect any, we complain
         * but proceed.
         */
        if (BrinTupleIsPlaceholder(tup))
            ereport(WARNING,
                    (errmsg("leftover placeholder tuple detected in BRIN index \"%s\", deleting",
                            RelationGetRelationName(idxrel))));
    
    Now, there was no preceding crash in these tests, so the comment's claim
    is evidently a lie.  But what's going wrong?  The postmaster log provides
    a strong hint:
    
    2020-06-30 03:50:14.603 EDT [3699:48] pg_regress/brin LOG:  statement: SELECT brin_desummarize_range('brinidx', 0);
    2020-06-30 03:50:15.894 EDT [3699:49] pg_regress/brin LOG:  process 3699 still waiting for ShareUpdateExclusiveLock on relation 24795 of database 16384 after 1000.094 ms
    2020-06-30 03:50:15.894 EDT [3699:50] pg_regress/brin DETAIL:  Process holding the lock: 7237. Wait queue: 3699.
    2020-06-30 03:50:15.894 EDT [3699:51] pg_regress/brin STATEMENT:  SELECT brin_desummarize_range('brinidx', 0);
    2020-06-30 03:50:15.895 EDT [7237:1] ERROR:  canceling autovacuum task
    2020-06-30 03:50:15.895 EDT [7237:2] CONTEXT:  while cleaning up index "brinidx" of relation "public.brintest"
    	automatic vacuum of table "regression.public.brintest"
    2020-06-30 03:50:15.899 EDT [3699:52] pg_regress/brin LOG:  process 3699 acquired ShareUpdateExclusiveLock on relation 24795 of database 16384 after 1001.626 ms
    2020-06-30 03:50:15.899 EDT [3699:53] pg_regress/brin STATEMENT:  SELECT brin_desummarize_range('brinidx', 0);
    2020-06-30 03:50:16.018 EDT [3699:54] pg_regress/brin WARNING:  leftover placeholder tuple detected in BRIN index "brinidx", deleting
    2020-06-30 03:50:16.031 EDT [3699:55] pg_regress/brin LOG:  statement: SELECT brin_summarize_range('brinidx', 0);
    
    I think the "crash" actually was the forced autovac cancellation we see
    here.  Thus, the fact that both these animals use CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS is
    not a direct cause of the failure, though it might contribute to getting
    the timing right for this to happen.
    
    So (1) the comment needs to be adjusted to mention that vacuum
    cancellation is enough to create the situation, and (2) probably the
    message needs to be downgraded quite a lot, DEBUG2 or even less.
    Or maybe we could just delete the quoted stanza altogether.
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
    
    
  2. Re: Intermittent BRIN failures on hyrax and lousyjack

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-07-01T03:28:39Z

    On 2020-Jun-30, Tom Lane wrote:
    
    >  SELECT brin_desummarize_range('brinidx', 0);
    > +WARNING:  leftover placeholder tuple detected in BRIN index "brinidx", deleting
    
    > I think the "crash" actually was the forced autovac cancellation we see
    > here.  Thus, the fact that both these animals use CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS is
    > not a direct cause of the failure, though it might contribute to getting
    > the timing right for this to happen.
    
    Oh, interesting.
    
    > So (1) the comment needs to be adjusted to mention that vacuum
    > cancellation is enough to create the situation, and (2) probably the
    > message needs to be downgraded quite a lot, DEBUG2 or even less.
    > Or maybe we could just delete the quoted stanza altogether.
    
    Yeah, maybe deleting the whole thing is a decent answer.  When I wrote
    that, I was thinking that it was a very unlikely event, but evidently
    that's not true.
    
    -- 
    Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: Intermittent BRIN failures on hyrax and lousyjack

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2020-07-09T22:46:20Z

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
    > On 2020-Jun-30, Tom Lane wrote:
    >> SELECT brin_desummarize_range('brinidx', 0);
    >> +WARNING:  leftover placeholder tuple detected in BRIN index "brinidx", deleting
    
    >> So (1) the comment needs to be adjusted to mention that vacuum
    >> cancellation is enough to create the situation, and (2) probably the
    >> message needs to be downgraded quite a lot, DEBUG2 or even less.
    >> Or maybe we could just delete the quoted stanza altogether.
    
    > Yeah, maybe deleting the whole thing is a decent answer.  When I wrote
    > that, I was thinking that it was a very unlikely event, but evidently
    > that's not true.
    
    trilobite (also a CCA animal) just reported one of these, too:
    
    https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=trilobite&dt=2020-07-09%2008%3A03%3A08
    
    Were you going to fix this, or did you expect me to?
    If the latter, I lean to just deleting the message.
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
    
    
  4. Re: Intermittent BRIN failures on hyrax and lousyjack

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-07-09T22:55:48Z

    On 2020-Jul-09, Tom Lane wrote:
    
    > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
    > > On 2020-Jun-30, Tom Lane wrote:
    > >> SELECT brin_desummarize_range('brinidx', 0);
    > >> +WARNING:  leftover placeholder tuple detected in BRIN index "brinidx", deleting
    > 
    > >> So (1) the comment needs to be adjusted to mention that vacuum
    > >> cancellation is enough to create the situation, and (2) probably the
    > >> message needs to be downgraded quite a lot, DEBUG2 or even less.
    > >> Or maybe we could just delete the quoted stanza altogether.
    > 
    > > Yeah, maybe deleting the whole thing is a decent answer.  When I wrote
    > > that, I was thinking that it was a very unlikely event, but evidently
    > > that's not true.
    > 
    > trilobite (also a CCA animal) just reported one of these, too:
    > 
    > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=trilobite&dt=2020-07-09%2008%3A03%3A08
    > 
    > Were you going to fix this, or did you expect me to?
    
    I have a moment now, let me have a go at it.  I agree with deleting the
    message.  I think I'll keep the comment, slightly reworded:
    
    	/*
    	 * Placeholder tuples only appear during unfinished summarization, and we
    	 * hold SUE lock, so this function cannot run concurrently with
    	 * that.  Any placeholder tuples that exist must be leftovers from a
    	 * crashed or aborted summarization; remove them silently.
    	 */
    
    -- 
    Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
    
  5. Re: Intermittent BRIN failures on hyrax and lousyjack

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-07-10T00:22:04Z

    On 2020-Jul-09, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
    
    > I have a moment now, let me have a go at it.  I agree with deleting the
    > message.  I think I'll keep the comment, slightly reworded:
    > 
    > 	/*
    > 	 * Placeholder tuples only appear during unfinished summarization, and we
    > 	 * hold SUE lock, so this function cannot run concurrently with
    > 	 * that.  Any placeholder tuples that exist must be leftovers from a
    > 	 * crashed or aborted summarization; remove them silently.
    > 	 */
    
    Pushed to all branches.
    
    -- 
    Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services