Re:
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andrey Klychkov <aaklychkov@mail.ru>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2020-06-09T01:36:31Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 01:37:07PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I think this part remains unanswered: why are there *three* invalid > indexes, and not two? It makes sense for the UNIQUE indexes to acquire > invalid duplicates, but strangely we also have a > act_re_procdef_deployment_id_idx_ccnew which is *not* unique. What > happened there? More than one REINDEX query at table-level failed I guess? > (I also wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to reindexdb to attempt to > drop indexes that it couldn't complete.) (That's a good idea.) -- Michael
Commits
-
Doc: Mention about caveats of --concurrently on reindexdb page
- 38be24228dcd 12.4 landed
- 9b60c4b979bc 13.0 landed