Re:

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andrey Klychkov <aaklychkov@mail.ru>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2020-06-09T01:36:31Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 01:37:07PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think this part remains unanswered: why are there *three* invalid
> indexes, and not two?  It makes sense for the UNIQUE indexes to acquire
> invalid duplicates, but strangely we also have a
> act_re_procdef_deployment_id_idx_ccnew which is *not* unique.  What
> happened there?

More than one REINDEX query at table-level failed I guess?

> (I also wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to reindexdb to attempt to
> drop indexes that it couldn't complete.)

(That's a good idea.)
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Doc: Mention about caveats of --concurrently on reindexdb page