Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)

Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-06-05T20:40:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 10:04:14PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 05:20:52PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>
>>...
>>
>>which is not particularly great, I guess. There however seems to be
>>something wrong, because with the prefetching I see this in the log:
>>
>>prefetch:
>>2020-06-05 02:47:25.970 CEST 1591318045.970 [22961] LOG:  recovery no
>>longer prefetching: unexpected pageaddr 108/E8000000 in log segment
>>0000000100000108000000FF, offset 0
>>
>>prefetch2:
>>2020-06-05 15:29:23.895 CEST 1591363763.895 [26676] LOG:  recovery no
>>longer prefetching: unexpected pageaddr 108/E8000000 in log segment
>>000000010000010900000001, offset 0
>>
>>Which seems pretty suspicious, but I have no idea what's wrong. I admit
>>the archive/restore commands are a bit hacky, but I've only seen this
>>with prefetching on the SATA storage, while all other cases seem to be
>>just fine. I haven't seen in on NVME (which processes much more WAL).
>>And the SATA baseline (no prefetching) also worked fine.
>>
>>Moreover, the pageaddr value is the same in both cases, but the WAL
>>segments are different (but just one segment apart). Seems strange.
>>
>
>I suspected it might be due to a somewhat hackish restore_command that
>prefetches some of the WAL segments,  so I tried again with a much
>simpler restore_command - essentially just:
>
>  restore_command = 'cp /archive/%f %p.tmp && mv %p.tmp %p'
>
>which I think should be fine for testing purposes. And I got this:
>
>  LOG:  recovery no longer prefetching: unexpected pageaddr 108/57000000
>        in log segment 0000000100000108000000FF, offset 0
>  LOG:  restored log file "0000000100000108000000FF" from archive
>
>which is the same segment as in the earlier examples, but with a
>different pageaddr value. Of course, there's no such pageaddr in the WAL
>segment (and recovery of that segment succeeds).
>
>So I think there's something broken ...
>

BTW in all three cases it happens right after the first restart point in
the WAL stream:

    LOG:  restored log file "0000000100000108000000FD" from archive
    LOG:  restartpoint starting: time
    LOG:  restored log file "0000000100000108000000FE" from archive
    LOG:  restartpoint complete: wrote 236092 buffers (22.5%); 0 WAL ...
    LOG:  recovery restart point at 108/FC000028
    DETAIL:  Last completed transaction was at log time 2020-06-04
             15:27:00.95139+02.
    LOG:  recovery no longer prefetching: unexpected pageaddr
          108/57000000 in log segment 0000000100000108000000FF, offset 0
    LOG:  restored log file "0000000100000108000000FF" from archive

It looks exactly like this in case of all 3 failures ...

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services 



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix recovery_prefetch docs.

  2. Prefetch data referenced by the WAL, take II.

  3. Add circular WAL decoding buffer, take II.

  4. Fix generation of ./INSTALL for the distribution tarball

  5. Revert recovery prefetching feature.

  6. Sync guc.c and postgresql.conf.sample with the SGML docs.

  7. Add information of total data processed to replication slot stats.

  8. Doc: Review for "Optionally prefetch referenced data in recovery."

  9. Add circular WAL decoding buffer.

  10. Optionally prefetch referenced data in recovery.

  11. Remove read_page callback from XLogReader.

  12. Provide ReadRecentBuffer() to re-pin buffers by ID.

  13. Provide recovery_init_sync_method=syncfs.

  14. Mark factorial operator, and postfix operators in general, as deprecated.

  15. Rationalize GetWalRcv{Write,Flush}RecPtr().

  16. Support PrefetchBuffer() in recovery.

  17. Prevent hard failures of standbys caused by recycled WAL segments