Re: SIGSEGV from START_REPLICATION 0/XXXXXXX in XLogSendPhysical () at walsender.c:2762
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-06-03T21:44:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Jun-02, Michael Paquier wrote: > I can note as well that StartLogicalReplication() moves in this sense > by setting xlogreader to be the one from logical_decoding_ctx once the > decoding context has been created. > > This results in the attached. The extra test from upthread to check > that logical decoding is not allowed in a non-database WAL sender is a > good idea, so I have kept it. I don't particularly disagree with your proposed patch -- in fact, it seems to make things cleaner. It is a little wasteful, but I don't really mind that. It's just some memory, and it's not a significant amount. That said, I would *also* apply Kyotaro's proposed patch to prohibit a physical standby running with a logical slot, if only because that reduces the number of combinations that we need to test and keep our collective heads straight about. Just reject the weird case and have one type of slot for each type of replication. I didn't even think this was at all possible. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix crash in WAL sender when starting physical replication
- 10ffe0fa72ed 13.0 landed
- 879ad9f90e83 14.0 landed
-
Add a SHOW command to the replication command language.
- d1ecd539477f 10.0 cited