Re: SIGSEGV from START_REPLICATION 0/XXXXXXX in XLogSendPhysical () at walsender.c:2762
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2020-05-29T07:21:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 06:11:39PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Mmm. It is not the proper way to use physical replication and it's
> totally accidental that that worked (or even it might be a bug). The
> documentation is saying as the follows, as more-or-less the same for
> all versions since 9.4.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/protocol-replication.html
+ if (am_db_walsender)
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
+ errmsg("cannot initiate physical
replication on a logical replication connection")));
I don't agree with this change. The only restriction that we have in
place now in walsender.c regarding MyDatabaseId not being set is to
prevent the execution of SQL commands. Note that it is possible to
start physical replication even if MyDatabaseId is set in a
replication connection, so you could break cases that have been valid
until now.
I think that we actually should be much more careful with the
initialization of the WAL reader used in the context of a WAL sender
before calling WALRead() and attempting to read a new WAL page.
--
Michael
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix crash in WAL sender when starting physical replication
- 10ffe0fa72ed 13.0 landed
- 879ad9f90e83 14.0 landed
-
Add a SHOW command to the replication command language.
- d1ecd539477f 10.0 cited