Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.

On 2020-May-14, Tom Lane wrote:

> A case could be made for doing s/async/notify/ more widely in async.c;
> for instance it's odd that the struct protected by NotifyQueueLock
> didn't get renamed to NotifyQueueControl.  But that seems a bit out
> of scope for the immediate problem, and anyway I'm not sure how far to
> take it.  I don't really want to rename async.c's externally-visible
> functions, for instance.  For the moment I just renamed symbols used
> in the SimpleLruInit() call.

That approach seems fine -- we'd only rename those things if and when we
modified them for other reasons; and the file itself, probably not at all.
Much like our renaming of XLOG to WAL, we changed the user-visible term
all at once, but the code kept the original names until changed.


Maybe in N years, when the SCM tooling is much better (so that it
doesn't get confused by us having renamed the file in the newer branches
and back-patching to an older branch), we can rename xlog.c to wal.c and
async.c to notify.c.  Or maybe not.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services