Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Cc: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-05-06T18:53:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Apr-08, Andrew Gierth wrote: > >>>>> "Alvaro" == Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > >> This needs to be fixed in ruleutils, IMO, not by changing what the > >> grammar accepts. > > Alvaro> Fair. I didn't change what the grammar accepts. I ended up only > Alvaro> throwing an error in parse analysis when a bare NULL const is > Alvaro> seen. > > This seems far too arbitrary to me. Oops, I saw this comment only now. We're still on time to fix this, if there's something that needs fixing. Let's discuss what changes are needed. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Support FETCH FIRST WITH TIES
- 357889eb17bb 13.0 landed