Horton

Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Steven Pousty <steve.pousty@gmail.com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>, Pierre Giraud <pierre.giraud@dalibo.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-04-23T16:23:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:04:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > I've played with this a bit, and there are certainly a lot of 
> > interesting things that you can do with CSS nowadays that would preserve 
> > some semblance of semantic markup on both the DocBook side and the HTML 
> > side.
> 
> As I said, I'm happy to do the legwork of improving the markup if someone
> will point me in the right direction.  But I know next to zip about CSS,
> so it would not be productive for me to do the basic design there ---
> it would take too long and there would probably still be lots to criticize
> in whatever I came up with.

I can do the CSS if you tell me what you want.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +

Commits

  1. Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.

  2. Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.