Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-04-20T21:31:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Apr-20, Tom Lane wrote: > Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com> writes: > > While table 9.5 with functions looks quite nice, I quite dislike 9.4 with > > operators. > > Previously, I could lookup operator in the leftmost column and read on. > > Right now I have to look through the whole table (well, not really, but > > still) to find the operator. > > Aside from the alternatives already discussed, There's one with a separate column for the operator, without types, at the left (the "with names" example at https://postgr.es/m/14380.1587242177@sss.pgh.pa.us ). That seemed pretty promising -- not sure why it was discarded. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.
- 4ad047a6eac3 13.0 landed
-
Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.
- 737d69ffc3cf 13.0 landed