Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery
Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
From: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2020-04-08T11:58:30Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 11:23:45 +0900
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 05:17:36PM +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> > I'm not sure who would need this information before the WAL machinery is up,
> > but is it safe enough in your opinion for futur usage of
> > GetRecoveryState()? Do you think this information might be useful before
> > the WAL machinery is set? Current "user" (eg. restoreTwoPhaseData()) only
> > need to know if we are in recovery, whatever the reason.
>
> (I had this thread marked as something to look at, but could not.
> Sorry for the delay).
(no worries :))
> > src/test/recovery/t/011_crash_recovery.pl | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/test/recovery/t/011_crash_recovery.pl
> > b/src/test/recovery/t/011_crash_recovery.pl index ca6e92b50d..ce2e899891
> > 100644 --- a/src/test/recovery/t/011_crash_recovery.pl
> > +++ b/src/test/recovery/t/011_crash_recovery.pl
> > @@ -15,11 +15,17 @@ if ($Config{osname} eq 'MSWin32')
>
> May I ask why this new test is added to 011_crash_recovery.pl which is
> aimed at testing crash and redo, while we have 002_archiving.pl that
> is dedicated to archiving in a more general manner?
I thought it was a better place because the test happen during crash recovery.
In the meantime, while working on other tests related to $SUBJECT and the
current consensus, I was wondering if a new file would be a better place anyway.
Commits
-
Fix interpolation in test name.
- e16e9204692c 11.10 landed
- af2d09fa1c28 12.5 landed
- 6fb1c5b52826 13.0 landed
- 47a3a1c3d498 14.0 landed
-
Add more TAP coverage for archive status with crash recovery of standbys
- ebf6de869276 13.0 landed
-
Fix handling of WAL segments ready to be archived during crash recovery
- 9eff11653962 9.5.22 landed
- c2d8ae0dfe84 9.6.18 landed
- 02657c42199c 10.13 landed
- 2d24ca00b750 11.8 landed
- 22db5269bfa1 12.3 landed
- 4e87c4836ab9 13.0 landed
-
Fix WAL recycling on standbys depending on archive_mode
- 78ea8b5daab9 12.0 cited