Horton

Re: Don't try fetching future segment of a TLI.

Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
To: masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com
Cc: psuderevsky@gmail.com, david@pgmasters.net, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2020-04-07T01:29:09Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers 
Thank you for picking this up.

At Tue, 7 Apr 2020 02:43:02 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote in 
> On 2020/03/19 22:22, Pavel Suderevsky wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've tested patch provided by Kyotaro and do confirm it fixes the
> > issue.
> 
> The patch looks good to me. Attached is the updated version of the
> patch.
> I updated only comments.

+			 * The logfile segment that doesn't belong to the timeline is
+			 * older or newer than the segment that the timeline started or
+			 * eneded at, respectively. It's sufficient to check only the

s/eneded/ended/ ?

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

Commits

  1. Prevent archive recovery from scanning non-existent WAL files.