Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?

Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
To: noah@leadboat.com
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, michael@paquier.xyz, 9erthalion6@gmail.com, andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com, hlinnaka@iki.fi, andres@anarazel.de
Date: 2020-04-06T00:46:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At Sat, 4 Apr 2020 15:32:12 -0700, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote in 
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 06:24:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Shouldn't the CF entry get closed?
> 
> Once the buildfarm is clean for a day, sure.  The buildfarm has already
> revealed a missing perl2host call.

Thank you for (re-) committing this and the following fix. I hope this
doesn't bring in another failure.

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



Commits

  1. Add perl2host call missing from a new test file.

  2. Skip WAL for new relfilenodes, under wal_level=minimal.

  3. Revert "Skip WAL for new relfilenodes, under wal_level=minimal."

  4. Back-patch log_newpage_range().

  5. During heap rebuild, lock any TOAST index until end of transaction.

  6. In log_newpage_range(), heed forkNum and page_std arguments.

  7. Back-patch src/test/recovery and PostgresNode from 9.6 to 9.5.

  8. Reduce pg_ctl's reaction time when waiting for postmaster start/stop.

  9. Accelerate end-of-transaction dropping of relations

  10. Redesign the planner's handling of index-descent cost estimation.

  11. Make TRUNCATE do truncate-in-place when processing a relation that was created