Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
Date: 2010-02-17T06:39:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > * Fix large object support in pg_dump. I think this is just waiting > for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct. I've been > meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe > someone else would like to take a look? This is an open item, so we > should really try to deal with it. Yeah, I think this is a "must fix for alpha" item. Will look at it tomorrow, god willin an the creek don't rise (or, given the weather around here: the power stays on). > * Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync. This is really two > patches now, one of which is apparently to be backpatched. This one (both parts) seems to have crashed and burned on unexpected portability issues :-(. Do we have any expectation of being able to fix it before alpha4? regards, tom lane