Horton

Re: pgsql: Superuser can permit passwordless connections on postgres_fdw

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-12-25T02:25:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:17:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, it's sort of annoying that the buildfarm didn't notice this
> aspect of things.  I'm not sure I want to spend cycles on checking
> it in every test run, though.
> 
> Maybe we could have -DENFORCE_REGRESSION_TEST_NAME_RESTRICTIONS
> enable a check for that aspect along with what it does now?

Makes sense to restrict that under the flag.  Perhaps a catalog scan
of pg_authid at the end of pg_regress and isolationtester then?
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Adjust test case added by commit 6136e94dc.

  2. libpq should expose GSS-related parameters even when not implemented.

  3. Superuser can permit passwordless connections on postgres_fdw