Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY unexpectedly fails

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Manuel Rigger <rigger.manuel@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-12-23T01:59:56Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 12:45:36PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Sounds like a better wording to me.  Documenting it still seems rather
> important to me as I suspect that it could surprise some users.

So, are there any more comments/objections about this stuff?  I have
plans to look at that again and wrap it at the beginning of January.
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Fix concurrent indexing operations with temporary tables