Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY unexpectedly fails
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Manuel Rigger <rigger.manuel@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-12-23T01:59:56Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 12:45:36PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Sounds like a better wording to me. Documenting it still seems rather > important to me as I suspect that it could surprise some users. So, are there any more comments/objections about this stuff? I have plans to look at that again and wrap it at the beginning of January. -- Michael
Commits
-
Fix concurrent indexing operations with temporary tables
- d76652edc56f 9.4.26 landed
- c39f45598177 9.5.21 landed
- ef33edeb5835 9.6.17 landed
- 9055344b495f 10.12 landed
- 5b4b07fa9ac3 11.7 landed
- 817a1b88ac66 12.2 landed
- a904abe2e284 13.0 landed