Thread

Commits

  1. Fix tuple column count in pg_control_init().

  2. Remove configure --disable-float4-byval

  1. pg_control_init() bug

    Nathan Bossart <bossartn@amazon.com> — 2019-12-10T21:11:12Z

    Hello,
    
    I noticed that pg_control_init() is failing an assertion on 13devel:
    
        TRAP: FailedAssertion("(atti->attalign) == 's'", File: "heaptuple.c", Line: 160)
        postgres: bossartn postgres [local] SELECT(ExceptionalCondition+0x55)[0x8e02b5]
        postgres: bossartn postgres [local] SELECT(heap_compute_data_size+0x224)[0x486eb4]
        postgres: bossartn postgres [local] SELECT(heap_form_tuple+0x82)[0x488262]
        postgres: bossartn postgres [local] SELECT(pg_control_init+0x259)[0x902ca9]
        postgres: bossartn postgres [local] SELECT(ExecMakeTableFunctionResult+0x345)[0x656a65]
        postgres: bossartn postgres [local] SELECT[0x667e03]
        postgres: bossartn postgres [local] SELECT(ExecScan+0x3ab)[0x6572db]
        postgres: bossartn postgres [local] SELECT(standard_ExecutorRun+0x137)[0x64f097]
        postgres: bossartn postgres [local] SELECT[0x7c5d8b]
        postgres: bossartn postgres [local] SELECT(PortalRun+0x1d1)[0x7c71c1]
        postgres: bossartn postgres [local] SELECT[0x7c34d1]
        postgres: bossartn postgres [local] SELECT(PostgresMain+0x624)[0x7c4aa4]
        postgres: bossartn postgres [local] SELECT[0x74109a]
        postgres: bossartn postgres [local] SELECT(main+0x440)[0x69f220]
        /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)[0x7fbb78309d1d]
        postgres: bossartn postgres [local] SELECT[0x47b039]
        2019-12-10 20:02:03.100 UTC [20859] LOG:  server process (PID 20868) was terminated by signal 6: Aborted
        2019-12-10 20:02:03.100 UTC [20859] DETAIL:  Failed process was running: SELECT * FROM pg_control_init();
        2019-12-10 20:02:03.100 UTC [20859] LOG:  terminating any other active server processes
    
    The attached patch seems to clear this up.  I think this was missed in
    2e4db241.
    
    Nathan
    
    
  2. Re: pg_control_init() bug

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2019-12-10T22:46:48Z

    "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com> writes:
    > I noticed that pg_control_init() is failing an assertion on 13devel:
    
    Hmm, yeah.  In a non-assert build I get
    
    regression=# select * from pg_control_init();
    ERROR:  function return row and query-specified return row do not match
    DETAIL:  Returned row contains 12 attributes, but query expects 11.
    
    > The attached patch seems to clear this up.  I think this was missed in
    > 2e4db241.
    
    Evidently.  Thanks for the report!
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: pg_control_init() bug

    Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> — 2019-12-21T20:42:27Z

    On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 05:46:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
    > "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com> writes:
    > > I noticed that pg_control_init() is failing an assertion on 13devel:
    > 
    > Hmm, yeah.  In a non-assert build I get
    > 
    > regression=# select * from pg_control_init();
    > ERROR:  function return row and query-specified return row do not match
    > DETAIL:  Returned row contains 12 attributes, but query expects 11.
    > 
    > > The attached patch seems to clear this up.  I think this was missed in
    > > 2e4db241.
    > 
    > Evidently.  Thanks for the report!
    
    FYI, this has been applied:
    
    	Fix tuple column count in pg_control_init().
    	
    	Oversight in commit 2e4db241b.
    	
    	Nathan Bossart
    	
    	Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1B616360-396A-4482-AA28-375566C86160@amazon.com
    	
    	Branch
    	------
    	master
    	
    	Details
    	-------
    	https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/8729fa72483f8a9acf299508bb2cbae1aa9a29b8
    	
    	Modified Files
    	--------------
    	src/backend/utils/misc/pg_controldata.c | 2 +-
    	1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
    
    -- 
      Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
      EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
    
    + As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
    +                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +