Re: Hooks for session start and end, take two

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com" <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>, 'Andres Freund' <andres@anarazel.de>, 'Fujii Masao' <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, 'Fabrízio de Royes Mello' <fabriziomello@gmail.com>, 'legrand legrand' <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com>, 'Pgsql Hackers' <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-12-20T14:33:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Dec-20, Tom Lane wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On 2019-Dec-20, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> The patch has been committed once as of e788bd9, then reverted as of
> >> 9555cc8 because it had a couple of fundamental issues and many people
> >> were not happy with it.
> 
> > Hmm, should we mark the commitfest entry as rejected then?  Having it be
> > marked committed seems pretty confusing.  The next version of the patch
> > would have its own CF entry, I presume.
> 
> RWF seems appropriate.  We haven't rejected the concept altogether,
> AFAICT.

Fair enough.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



Commits

  1. Add hooks for session start and session end, take two