Re: Hooks for session start and end, take two
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com" <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>, 'Andres Freund' <andres@anarazel.de>, 'Fujii Masao' <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, 'Fabrízio de Royes Mello' <fabriziomello@gmail.com>, 'legrand legrand' <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com>, 'Pgsql Hackers' <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-12-20T14:33:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Dec-20, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On 2019-Dec-20, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> The patch has been committed once as of e788bd9, then reverted as of > >> 9555cc8 because it had a couple of fundamental issues and many people > >> were not happy with it. > > > Hmm, should we mark the commitfest entry as rejected then? Having it be > > marked committed seems pretty confusing. The next version of the patch > > would have its own CF entry, I presume. > > RWF seems appropriate. We haven't rejected the concept altogether, > AFAICT. Fair enough. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Add hooks for session start and session end, take two
- e788bd924c19 13.0 landed