Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-12-01T01:55:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 09:01:48PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Yeah, the opclass params patches got broken by 773df883e adding enum
> reloptions. The breakage is somewhat extensive so I'll leave it up to
> Nikita to fix it in [1]. Until that happens, apply the patches on
> top of caba97a9d9 for review.

This has been close to two months now, so I have the patch as RwF.
Feel free to update if you think that's incorrect.
--
Michael

Commits

  1. BRIN minmax-multi indexes

  2. BRIN bloom indexes

  3. Support the old signature of BRIN consistent function

  4. Remove unnecessary pg_amproc BRIN minmax entries

  5. Optimize allocations in bringetbitmap

  6. Move IS [NOT] NULL handling from BRIN support functions

  7. Pass all scan keys to BRIN consistent function at once

  8. Properly detoast data in brin_form_tuple