Re: Slow response to my query
Bzzzz <lazyvirus@gmx.com>
From: Bzzzz <lazyvirus@gmx.com>
To: Goke Aruna <goksie@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Pousty <steve.pousty@gmail.com>,
pgsql-novice@lists.postgresql.org, Babatunde Adeyemi
<barbietunnie@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-11-29T14:56:28Z
Lists: pgsql-novice
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 15:38:53 +0100 Goke Aruna <goksie@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Jean-Yves / Steven, > am using V12. Depending on the way you mostly use your columns, you can also do the opposite: store date/timestamp into "pieces" in different columns (century, month, day, hours, minutes, seconds, milliseconds, time zone shift) and reconstitute a whole date/ts into an auto-generated column. Sometimes, you have to break the rules, especially with a large number of rows, because pre-calculation is way better than post in this case. Depending on your needs, you might also be interested into that: https://severalnines.com/database-blog/guide-partitioning-data-postgresql BTW, don't leave us dry, share your progress and results *<;-) Jean-Yves > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:21 PM Bzzzz <lazyvirus@gmx.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 12:09:04 +0100 > > Goke Aruna <goksie@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Oops, I forgot, > > > > as you're not using V.12, it might not be a bad idea to create new > > columns and trigger(s) to pre-calculate all of the EXTRACT/2 you > > need. > > > > Jean-Yves > >