Horton

Re: accounting for memory used for BufFile during hash joins

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Hubert Zhang <hzhang@pivotal.io>, hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-11-25T08:33:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:47:51PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> My feeling is that we should get the BNLJ committed first, and then maybe
> use some of those additional strategies as fallbacks (depending on which
> issues are still unsolved by the BNLJ).

The glacier is melting more.  Tomas, what's your status here?  The
patch has been waiting on author for two months now.  If you are not
planning to work more on this one, then it should be marked as
returned with feedback?
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Consider BufFiles when adjusting hashjoin parameters