Horton

Re: [PATCH] use separate PartitionedRelOptions structure to store partitioned table options

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan@nataraj.su>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Dent John <denty@qqdd.eu>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata.aya@jp.fujitsu.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-11-14T03:38:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 05:02:24PM +0300, Nikolay Shaplov wrote:
> I did not read that thread yet, when I sent v3 patch.
> build_reloptions is a good stuff and we should use it for sure.
> 
> I've looked at yours v4 version of the patch, it is exactly what we need here. 
> Can we commit it as it is?

I have done an extra lookup, removing PartitionedRelOptions because we
have no need for it yet, and committed the split. 
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Split handling of reloptions for partitioned tables