Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, brian.williams@mayalane.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-11-07T21:27:50Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 07:55:22PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 7 Nov 2019, at 16:03, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > because we have not explained what a "virgin database" is. > > I think this is the key observation. > > > We could say "empty", which seems better suited than both "virgin" and > > "pristine" anyway. > > empty is a lot better, but still isn't conveying the state of the database > without there being room for interpretation. (My grasp of the english language > isn't enough to suggest a better alternative however). I am thinking "pristine" would be a good word here. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
Commits
-
Remove the word "virgins" for documentation
- 6ae4d271879b 13.0 landed