Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, brian.williams@mayalane.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-11-07T21:27:50Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Thu, Nov  7, 2019 at 07:55:22PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 7 Nov 2019, at 16:03, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> 
> > because we have not explained what a "virgin database" is.  
> 
> I think this is the key observation.
> 
> > We could say "empty", which seems better suited than both "virgin" and
> > "pristine" anyway.
> 
> empty is a lot better, but still isn't conveying the state of the database
> without there being room for interpretation.  (My grasp of the english language
> isn't enough to suggest a better alternative however).

I am thinking "pristine" would be a good word here.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



Commits

  1. Remove the word "virgins" for documentation