Horton

Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, "imai.yoshikazu@fujitsu.com" <imai.yoshikazu@fujitsu.com>, Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>, Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-11-04T14:53:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general 
On 2019-Oct-17, Tom Lane wrote:

> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > First, I'd like to clarify what I believe Tom's suggestion is, and then
> > talk through that, as his vote sways this topic pretty heavily.
> 
> > Tom, I take it your suggestion is to have '-f -' be accepted to mean
> > 'goes to stdout' in all branches?
> 
> Yes.

+1 for this, FWIW.  Let's get it done before next week minors.  Is
anybody writing a patch?  If not, I can do it.

> > If you meant for all branches to accept '-f -' and have it go to a './-'
> > file then that's just a revert of this entire change, which I can't
> > agree with either
> 
> No, I'm not proposing a full revert.  But there's certainly room to
> consider reverting the part that says you *must* write "-f -" to get
> output to stdout.

I don't think this will buy us anything, if we get past branches updated
promptly.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Change pg_restore -f- to dump to stdout instead of to ./-