Horton

Re: use of the term "verifier" with SCRAM

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Date: 2019-10-10T08:03:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 09:08:37AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Here is my proposed patch to adjust this.

Looks fine to me reading through.  I think that you are right to not
change the descriptions in build_server_final_message(), as that's
described similarly in RFC 5802.  By renaming scram_build_verifier()
to scram_build_secret() you are going to break one of my in-house
extensions.  I am using it to register for a user SCRAM veri^D^D^D^D
secrets with custom iteration and salt length :)
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Fix use of term "verifier"