Horton

Re: BUG #16045: vacuum_db crash and illegal memory alloc after pg_upgrade from PG11 to PG12

Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread
From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: buschmann@nidsa.net, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-10-09T23:28:36Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Move into separate file all the SQL queries used in pg_upgrade tests

  2. Add table to regression tests for binary-compatibility checks in pg_upgrade

  3. Fix tests of pg_upgrade across different major versions

  4. Multirange datatypes

  5. Work around cross-version-upgrade issues created by commit 9e38c2bb5.

  6. Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelement.

  7. Remove factorial operators, leaving only the factorial() function.

  8. Create by default sql/ and expected/ for output directory in pg_regress

  9. Add missing include to pg_upgrade/version.c

  10. Improve the check for pg_catalog.line data type in pg_upgrade

  11. Improve the check for pg_catalog.unknown data type in pg_upgrade

  12. Check for tables with sql_identifier during pg_upgrade

  13. pg_upgrade: clarify the database names in error files

  14. In the pg_upgrade test suite, don't write to src/test/regress.

  15. Allow group access on PGDATA

  16. Refactor dir/file permissions

  17. Remove unused functions in regress.c.

  18. Make WAL segment size configurable at initdb time.

  19. Fix bit-rot in pg_upgrade's test.sh, and improve documentation.

On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 07:18:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Well, I think I found the root cause. It's because of 7c15cef86d, which
>> changed the definition of sql_identifier so that it's a domain over name
>> instead of varchar.
>
>Ah...
>
>> Not sure what to do about this :-(
>
>Fortunately, there should be close to zero people with user tables
>depending on sql_identifier.  I think we should just add a test in
>pg_upgrade that refuses to upgrade if there are any such columns.
>It won't be the first such restriction.
>

Hmmm, yeah.  I agree the number of people using sql_identifier in user
tables is low, but OTOH we got this report within a week after release,
so maybe it's higher than we think.

Another option would be to teach pg_upgrade to switch the columns to
'text' or 'varchar', not sure if that's possible or how much work would
that be.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services