Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Fabien COELHO <fabien.coelho@mines-paristech.fr>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-03-29T14:01:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:41:38PM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote: >> I am not sure that "checksum status" is a correct term. It seems to >> me that "same configuration for data checksums as before the tool ran" >> or something like that would be more correct. > > Possibly, I cannot say. I have put more thoughts into this part, and committed the reorganization as you mainly suggested. -- Michael
Commits
-
Reorganize Notes section in documentation of pg_checksums
- a7cc52370b2b 12.0 landed
-
Add option -N/--no-sync to pg_checksums
- e0090c869008 12.0 landed
-
Add options to enable and disable checksums in pg_checksums
- ed308d783790 12.0 landed
-
Refactor more code logic to update the control file
- 8b938d36f744 12.0 landed
-
Rename pg_verify_checksums to pg_checksums
- 6dd263cfaa84 12.0 landed
-
Fix cross-version compatibility checks of pg_verify_checksums
- 501f58359b59 11.3 landed
- c9ae7f704c67 12.0 landed
-
Add routine able to update the control file to src/common/
- ce6afc6823fb 12.0 landed