Horton

Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Rahila Syed <rahila.syed@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-03-11T19:43:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2019-Mar-11, Robert Haas wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:26 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > Oh.  That's easily removed.  Though I have to say that other people said
> > that they liked it so much that they would have liked to have it in the
> > original VACUUM one too (5ba2b281-9c84-772a-cf37-17780d782936@lab.ntt.co.jp).
> 
> Huh.  Well, that's another option, but then what do we do if the
> number of phases is not a constant?

Well, why do we care?  "Some phases might be skipped".

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Report progress of REINDEX operations

  2. Report progress of CREATE INDEX operations

  3. Fix error handling of readdir() port implementation on first file lookup