Horton

Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-03-05T22:19:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2019-03-05 17:14:55 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> This patch is tiny, seems perfectly reasonable, and has plenty of
> support. I'm going to commit it shortly unless there are last minute
> objections.

+1

Commits

  1. Allow fractional input values for integer GUCs, and improve rounding logic.

  2. Reduce the default value of autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay to 2ms.

  3. Revert "Increase the default vacuum_cost_limit from 200 to 2000"

  4. Convert [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay into floating-point GUCs.

  5. Include GUC's unit, if it has one, in out-of-range error messages.

  6. Disallow NaN as a value for floating-point GUCs.

  7. Increase the default vacuum_cost_limit from 200 to 2000