Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at the end of relation
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k.jamison@jp.fujitsu.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-03-04T22:05:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add TRUNCATE parameter to VACUUM.
- b84dbc8eb80b 12.0 landed
-
Add vacuum_truncate reloption.
- 119dcfad988d 12.0 landed
-
Allow VACUUM to be run with index cleanup disabled.
- a96c41feec6b 12.0 cited
Hi, On 2019-03-04 22:00:47 +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote: > On 3/4/19, 1:44 PM, "Andres Freund" <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Yea, I do think that's a danger. But we allow disabling autovacuum, so > > I'm not sure it matters that much... And for indexes you'd still have > > the index page-level vacuum that'd continue to work. > > I think the difference here is that there isn't something like > autovacuum_freeze_max_age to force index cleanup at some point. > Granted, you can set autovacuum_freeze_max_age to 2B if you want, but > at least there's a fallback available. Well, but your cluster doesn't suddenly shut down because of index bloat (in contrast to xid wraparound). So I don't quite see an equivalent need for an emergency valve. I think we should just put a warning into the reloption's docs, and leave it at that. Greetings, Andres Freund