Re: Segfault when restoring -Fd dump on current HEAD
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Hubert Lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-02-28T02:10:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:02:43PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> I think we should save such a patch for whenever we next update the >> archive version number, which could take a couple of years given past >> history. I'm inclined to add a comment near K_VERS_SELF to remind >> whoever next patches it. > > +1. This isn't an unreasonable cleanup idea, but being only a cleanup > idea, it doesn't seem worth creating compatibility issues for. Let's > wait till there is some more-pressing reason to change the archive format, > and then fix this in the same release cycle. +1. Having a comment as reminder would be really nice. -- Michael
Commits
-
pg_dump: store unused attribs as NULL instead of '\0'
- 7fcdb5e00214 12.0 landed
-
pg_dump: Fix ArchiveEntry handling of some empty values
- 19455c9f5606 12.0 landed