Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Alexey Kondratov <a.kondratov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, vladimirlesk@yandex-team.ru, Dmitriy Sarafannikov <dsarafan@yandex-team.ru>
Date: 2019-02-16T03:41:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Move frontend-side archive APIs from src/common/ to src/fe_utils/
- 8d8b89266ca0 13.0 landed
- a3b2bf1fe7ce 14.0 landed
-
Add -c/--restore-target-wal to pg_rewind
- a7e8ece41cf7 13.0 landed
-
Move routine definitions of xlogarchive.c to a new header file
- 616ae3d2b056 13.0 landed
-
Move routine building restore_command to src/common/
- e09ad07b21a2 13.0 landed
-
Integrate recovery.conf into postgresql.conf
- 2dedf4d9a899 12.0 cited
Hi, On 2018-11-07 12:58:11 +0300, Alexey Kondratov wrote: > On 30.10.2018 06:01, Michael Paquier wrote: > > - Reusing the GUC parser is something I would avoid as well. Not worth > > the complexity. > > Yes, I don't like it either. I will try to make guc-file.l frontend safe. It sounds like a seriously bad idea to use a different parser for pg_rewind. Why don't you just use postgres for it? As in /path/to/postgres -D /path/to/datadir/ -C shared_buffers ?