Re: Feature: temporary materialized views
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-02-05T03:59:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 04:10:09PM +0100, Andreas Karlsson wrote: > Should I submit it as a separate CF entry or is it easiest if my refactoring > and Mi Tar's feature are reviewed together? The refactoring patch is talking about changing the way objects are created within a CTAS, which is quite different from what is proposed on this thread, so in order to attract the correct audience a separate thread with another CF entry seems more appropriate. Now... You have on this thread all the audience which already worked on 874fe3a. And I am just looking at this patch, evaluating the behavior change this is introducing. Still I would recommend a separate thread as others may want to comment on that particular point. -- Michael
Commits
-
Add more tests for CREATE TABLE AS with WITH NO DATA
- 537898bd81bd 12.0 landed