Re: BUG #15587: Partitions with ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-01-21T16:29:44Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On 2019-Jan-21, Amit Langote wrote: > Sorry about the noise. I agree with the committed approach. Great, thanks for checking. > With this, > ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY's inheritance recursion path now looks > completely different from ALTER TABLE ADD CHECK's, but that's fine. > Actually, if we had the same "clone" approach for check constraints, which > both checks if a child already has the constraint being cloned and creates > one if not, we could do away with errors like the following: > > create table p (a int, constraint check_a check (a > 0)) partition by list > create table p1 (a int); > alter table p attach partition p1 for values in (1); > ERROR: child table is missing constraint "check_a" > > But of course that would be a different feature. Heh, I wasn't aware that this failed in this silly way. But yeah, that's a different feature and we would certainly not backpatch a fix for it. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Fix creation of duplicate foreign keys on partitions
- 0325d7a5957b 12.0 landed
- 4dff8935fbab 11.2 landed