Horton

Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-01-15T00:06:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Hi,

On 2019-01-14 19:04:07 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> As that's the case, then I guess I'm thinking we really should make
> pg_upgrade complain if it finds it during the check phase.  I really
> don't like having a case like this where the pg_upgrade will fail from
> something that we could have detected during the pre-flight check,
> that's what it's for, after all.

I suggest you write a separate patch for that in that case.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

Commits

  1. Finish reverting "recheck_on_update" patch.