Re: btree.sgml typo?
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
To: pg@bowt.ie
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-01-08T01:00:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 1:35 AM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: >>> <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> includes an implementation of the >>> standard <acronym>btree</acronym> (multi-way binary tree) index data >>> structure. >>> >>> I think the term "btree" here means "multi-way balanced tree", rather >>> than "multi-way binary tree". In fact in our btree, there could be >>> more than one key in a node. Patch attached. >> >> +1 for applying this patch. The existing wording is highly confusing, >> especially because many people already incorrectly think that a B-Tree >> is just like a self-balancing binary search tree. >> >> There is no consensus on exactly what the "b" actually stands for, but >> it's definitely not "binary". I suppose that the original author meant >> that a B-Tree is a generalization of a binary tree, which is basically >> true -- though that's a very academic point. > > Any objection for this? If not, I will commit the patch to master and > REL_11_STABLE branches (btree.sgml first appeared in PostgreSQL 11). Done. Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
Commits
-
Doc: fix meaning of acronym "btree".
- 6ce6d983224a 11.2 landed
- a67212de198c 12.0 landed