Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes

Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-09-26T19:01:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 05:07:48PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>This patch fails to apply (or the opclass params one, maybe).  Please
>update.
>

Yeah, the opclass params patches got broken by 773df883e adding enum
reloptions. The breakage is somewhat extensive so I'll leave it up to
Nikita to fix it in [1]. Until that happens, apply the patches on
top of caba97a9d9 for review.

Thanks

[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/24/2183/

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



Commits

  1. BRIN minmax-multi indexes

  2. BRIN bloom indexes

  3. Support the old signature of BRIN consistent function

  4. Remove unnecessary pg_amproc BRIN minmax entries

  5. Optimize allocations in bringetbitmap

  6. Move IS [NOT] NULL handling from BRIN support functions

  7. Pass all scan keys to BRIN consistent function at once

  8. Properly detoast data in brin_form_tuple