Re: Efficient output for integer types
David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
From: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2019-09-21T06:08:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 03:36:21AM +0100, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> >>>>> "David" == David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
>
> David> + /* Compute the result string. */
> David> + if (value >= 100000000)
> David> + {
> David> + const uint32 value2 = value % 100000000;
> David> +
> David> + const uint32 c = value2 % 10000;
> David> + const uint32 d = value2 / 10000;
> David> + const uint32 c0 = (c % 100) << 1;
> David> + const uint32 c1 = (c / 100) << 1;
> David> + const uint32 d0 = (d % 100) << 1;
> David> + const uint32 d1 = (d / 100) << 1;
> David> +
> David> + char *pos = a + olength - i;
> David> +
> David> + value /= 100000000;
> David> +
> David> + memcpy(pos - 2, DIGIT_TABLE + c0, 2);
> David> + memcpy(pos - 4, DIGIT_TABLE + c1, 2);
> David> + memcpy(pos - 6, DIGIT_TABLE + d0, 2);
> David> + memcpy(pos - 8, DIGIT_TABLE + d1, 2);
> David> + i += 8;
> David> + }
>
> For the 32-bit case, there's no point in doing an 8-digit divide
> specially, it doesn't save any time. It's sufficient to just change
>
> David> + if (value >= 10000)
>
> to while(value >= 10000)
Done.
> in order to process 4 digits at a time.
>
> David> + for(int i = 0; i < minwidth - len; i++)
> David> + {
> David> + memcpy(str + i, DIGIT_TABLE, 1);
> David> + }
>
> Should be:
> memset(str, '0', minwidth-len);
Done.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Commits
-
Optimizations for integer to decimal output.
- 1fd687a03555 13.0 landed