Re: subscriptionCheck failures on nightjar
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-09-20T22:06:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Sep-20, Tom Lane wrote: > Actually, what I did was as attached [1], and I am getting traces like > [2]. The problem seems to occur only when there are two or three > processes concurrently creating the same snapshot file. It's not > obvious from the debug trace, but the snapshot file *does* exist > after the music stops. Uh .. I didn't think it was possible that we would build the same snapshot file more than once. Isn't that a waste of time anyway? Maybe we can fix the symptom by just not doing that in the first place? I don't have a strategy to do that, but seems worth considering before retiring the bf animals. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix "base" snapshot handling in logical decoding
- f49a80c481f7 11.0 cited