Re: Duplicated LSN in ReorderBuffer
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Ildar Musin <ildar@adjust.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2019-09-06T21:11:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On 2019-08-19 08:51:43 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On August 19, 2019 7:43:28 AM PDT, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >On 2019-Aug-19, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:36 AM Alvaro Herrera > ><alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > >> > BTW I wrote the code as suggested and it passes all the tests ... > >but I > >> > then noticed that the unpatched code doesn't fail Ildar's original > >> > pgbench-based test for me, either. So maybe my laptop is not > >powerful > >> > enough to reproduce it, or maybe I'm doing something wrong. > >> > >> If you share the patch fixing this issue I'll test it on my > >> environment where I could reproduce the original problem. > > > >Never mind. I was able to reproduce it later, and verify that Andres' > >proposed strategy doesn't seem to fix the problem. I'm going to study > >the problem again today. > > Could you post the patch? Ping? Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
-
logical decoding: process ASSIGNMENT during snapshot build
- e8c7f40a1f8a 9.4.25 landed
- bac2fae05c77 13.0 landed
- ae4305f6d303 9.6.16 landed
- 96b5033e1171 12.0 landed
- 7110f5c37721 9.5.20 landed
- 4f7dbf0ef50b 10.11 landed
- 41f3d262693b 11.6 landed
-
Ability to advance replication slots
- 9c7d06d60680 11.0 cited