Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?

Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
To: noah@leadboat.com
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, 9erthalion6@gmail.com, andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com, hlinnaka@iki.fi, robertmhaas@gmail.com, michael@paquier.xyz
Date: 2019-08-27T06:59:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

At Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:49:32 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in <20190827.154932.250364935.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
> 128GB shared buffers contain 16M buffers. On my
> perhaps-Windows-Vista-era box, such loop takes 15ms. (Since it
> has only 6GB, the test is ignoring the effect of cache that comes
> from the difference of the buffer size). (attached 1)
...
> For a 16MB file, the cost of write-fsyncing cost is almost the
> same to that of WAL-emitting cost. It was about 200 ms on the
> Vista-era machine with non-performant rotating magnetic disks
> with xfs. (attached 2, 3) Although write-fsyncing of relation
> file makes no lock conflict with other backends, WAL-emitting
> delays other backends' commits at most by that milliseconds.

FWIW, the attached are the programs I used to take the numbers.

testloop.c: to take time to loop over buffers in FlushRelationBuffers

testfile.c: to take time to sync a heap file. (means one file for the size)

testfile2.c: to take time to emit a wal record. (means 16MB per file)

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

Commits

  1. Add perl2host call missing from a new test file.

  2. Skip WAL for new relfilenodes, under wal_level=minimal.

  3. Revert "Skip WAL for new relfilenodes, under wal_level=minimal."

  4. Back-patch log_newpage_range().

  5. During heap rebuild, lock any TOAST index until end of transaction.

  6. In log_newpage_range(), heed forkNum and page_std arguments.

  7. Back-patch src/test/recovery and PostgresNode from 9.6 to 9.5.

  8. Reduce pg_ctl's reaction time when waiting for postmaster start/stop.

  9. Accelerate end-of-transaction dropping of relations

  10. Redesign the planner's handling of index-descent cost estimation.

  11. Make TRUNCATE do truncate-in-place when processing a relation that was created