Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-08-21T19:16:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Aug-21, Melanie Plageman wrote: > In Greenplum, we mainly add new tests to a separate isolation > framework (called isolation2) which uses a completely different > syntax. It doesn't use isolationtester at all. So, I haven't had a use > case to add long options to isolationtester yet :) Is that other framework somehow more capable? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Detect unused steps in isolation specs and do some cleanup
- 484c81bf7765 9.6.23 landed
- feac82fa8550 10.18 landed
- 8f32299424d9 11.13 landed
- 96f3661e4540 12.8 landed
- 989d23b04bea 13.0 landed
-
Remove dry-run mode from isolationtester
- b7cd5c5b02fa 9.6.23 landed
- 0ed218048932 10.18 landed
- 834cb7269166 11.13 landed
- a8f687927eea 12.8 landed
- 9903338b5ea5 13.0 landed