Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>
Cc: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>, Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope@jackdb.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>, "Moon, Insung" <Moon_Insung_i3@lab.ntt.co.jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-08-16T13:31:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Revamp the WAL record format.
- 2c03216d8311 9.5.0 cited
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 05:58:59PM +0500, Ibrar Ahmed wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:21 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:24:46AM +0200, Antonin Houska wrote: > > > I think there are several directions we can go after all-cluster > > > encryption, > > > > I think I misunderstood. What you summarize in > > > > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Transparent_Data_Encryption# > TODO_for_Full-Cluster_Encryption > > > > Do we have any status of TODO's, what has been done and what left? It's much > better if we have a link of discussion of each item. I think some are done and some are in process, but I don't have a good handle on that yet. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +