Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>
Cc: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>, Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope@jackdb.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>, "Moon, Insung" <Moon_Insung_i3@lab.ntt.co.jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-08-16T13:31:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Revamp the WAL record format.

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 05:58:59PM +0500, Ibrar Ahmed wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:21 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> 
>     On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:24:46AM +0200, Antonin Houska wrote:
>     > > I think there are several directions we can go after all-cluster
>     > > encryption,
>     >
>     > I think I misunderstood. What you summarize in
>     >
>     > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Transparent_Data_Encryption#
>     TODO_for_Full-Cluster_Encryption
>     >
> 
> Do we have any status of TODO's, what has been done and what left? It's much
> better if we have a link of discussion of each item.

I think some are done and some are in process, but I don't have a good
handle on that yet.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +