Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope@jackdb.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>, "Moon, Insung" <Moon_Insung_i3@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-08-10T12:06:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Revamp the WAL record format.
- 2c03216d8311 9.5.0 cited
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:54:51PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:17:53PM -0400, Sehrope Sarkuni wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:16 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 08:56:18AM -0400, Sehrope Sarkuni wrote: > > > Simplest approach for derived keys would be to use immutable attributes > > of the > > > WAL files as an input to the key derivation. Something like HKDF(MDEK, > > "WAL:" | > > > > So, I am thinking we should use "WAL:" for WAL and "REL:" for heap/index > > files. > > > > > > Sounds good. Any unique convention is fine. Main thing to keep in mind is that > > they're directly tied to the master key so it's not possible to rotate them > > without changing the master key. > > A recent email talked about using two different encryption keys for > heap/index and WAL, which allows for future features, and allows for key > rotation of the two independently. (I already stated how hard key > rotation would be with WAL and pg_rewind.) So, I just had an indea if we use separate encryption keys for heap/index and for WAL --- we already know we will have an offline tool that can rotate the passphrase or encryption keys. If we allow the encryption keys to be rotated independently, we can create a standby, and immediately rotate its heap/index encryption key. We can then start streaming replication. When we promote the standby to primary, we can then shut it down and rotate the WAL encryption key --- the new primary would then have no shared keys with the old primary. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +