Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>, "Moon, Insung" <Moon_Insung_i3@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-08-10T02:24:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Revamp the WAL record format.
- 2c03216d8311 9.5.0 cited
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 05:01:47PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote: > I know there were proposals to keep it encrypted in shared buffers, but > I'm not sure that's what we'll end up doing (I have not followed the > recent discussion all that closely, though). There is no plan to encrypt shared buffers. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +