Re: Problem with default partition pruning

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

To: yuzuko <yuzukohosoya@gmail.com>

Cc: shawn wang <shawn.wang.pg@gmail.com>, Shawn Wang <shawn.wang@highgo.ca>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2019-08-05T14:07:06Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Aug-05, yuzuko wrote:

> However, I'm still concerned that the block
> -----
> ...
> -----
> is written in the right place as Amit explained [1].

Yeah, I have that patch installed locally and I'm looking about it.
Thanks for the reminder.  I also have an eye on Horiguchi's patch
elsewhere in the thread.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

Don't constraint-exclude partitioned tables as much
- 815ef2f568c7 13.0 landed
Apply constraint exclusion more generally in partitioning
- 4e85642d935e 13.0 landed
Improve pruning of a default partition
- e3967a16d3a0 11.5 landed
- 86544071484a 12.0 landed
- 489247b0e615 13.0 landed
Doc: Fix event trigger firing table
- 44460d7017cd 13.0 cited
Remove obsolete nbtree insertion comment.
- 489e431ba56b 12.0 cited