Re: Problem with default partition pruning
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Cc: yuzuko <yuzukohosoya@gmail.com>, shawn wang <shawn.wang.pg@gmail.com>, Shawn Wang <shawn.wang@highgo.ca>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-31T12:48:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Jul-31, Amit Langote wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that the patch is still marked as "Waiting on Author" ever > since Shawn set it that way on June 17. Since Hosoya-san posted > updated patches on June 27, the status should've been changed to > "Needs Review". Or maybe "Ready for Committer", because the last time > I looked, at least the default partition pruning issue seems to be > sufficiently taken care of by the latest patch. Whether or not we > should apply the other patch (more aggressive use of constraint > exclusion by partprune.c on partitioned partitions), I'm not sure, but > maybe a committer can decide in an instant. :) Thanks for the status update. I intend to get this patch pushed before the next set of minors. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Don't constraint-exclude partitioned tables as much
- 815ef2f568c7 13.0 landed
-
Apply constraint exclusion more generally in partitioning
- 4e85642d935e 13.0 landed
-
Improve pruning of a default partition
- e3967a16d3a0 11.5 landed
- 86544071484a 12.0 landed
- 489247b0e615 13.0 landed
-
Doc: Fix event trigger firing table
- 44460d7017cd 13.0 cited
-
Remove obsolete nbtree insertion comment.
- 489e431ba56b 12.0 cited