Re: TopoSort() fix
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Rui Hai Jiang <ruihaij@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-29T01:50:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 08:24:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I think this is a sufficiently obvious bug, and a sufficiently > obvious fix, that we should just fix it and not insist on getting > a reproducible test case first. I think a test case would soon > bit-rot anyway, and no longer exercise the problem. > > I certainly do *not* want to wait so long that we miss the > upcoming minor releases. +1. Any volunteers? -- Michael
Commits
-
Add an isolation test to exercise parallel-worker deadlock resolution.
- da9456d22a76 13.0 landed
-
Mark advisory-lock functions as parallel restricted, not parallel unsafe.
- 4886da832750 13.0 landed
-
Fix busted logic for parallel lock grouping in TopoSort().
- d933816c04c6 12.0 landed
- c3b613e1b0e5 9.6.15 landed
- af41ab50fdc5 10.10 landed
- 3420851a2c2d 13.0 landed
- 0dcb1c6c4874 11.5 landed